Who am I? Who are We?
Currents in Theology & Mission
April 2004, Volume 31, Number 2
The answer to that question begins with our baptism, but
there are many detours and parentheses along the way. I
grew up in a Lutheran parsonage in Central Illinois, in
a town so small we used to go watch the cannon rust in the
town square for excitement. My grandparents were emigrants
from Germany. My grandmother died long before I was born,
and my grandfather, who lived long miles from our family,
died when I was five. I really only knew my nuclear family
of origin.
I’m about to head off to Marburg, Germany, on a writing
leave, and planned on checking out my genealogy by going
to the tiny town in Germany from which my grandparents came.
So I wrote by email to the pastor of the church in that
town, and she handed my name to a local retiree, who sent
me seven additional generations of my genealogy, going back
to Peter Klein, born about 1600 of the Common Era. All my
male ancestors were carpenters, save for my grandfather,
who built baby buggies in Germany before he took off for
America, possibly to find better work in making tires.
My grandfather’s name was Jacob Isaac, and I had
always wondered whether at some point my family had moved
from Judaism to Christianity. Now I know—for better
or worse—that we have been Lutherans for the last
four centuries. Now I know who I am. What am I going to
do about it?
Craig L. Nessan talks about the identity
of Wartburg Theological Seminary and notes that Wartburg
has a strong missionary history, beginning with the missionary
theology of Wilhelm Loehe. After first supporting Christian
ministry in Michigan, Loehe turned to Iowa, and this soon
led to the founding of Wartburg. Much of the early work
was in German settlements in Iowa, but there was also significant
outreach to Native Americans in Montana. After numerous
frustrating experiences on this front, the remaining funds
helped launch Lutheran missionary work in Papua New Guinea,
a connection between Wartburg and Papua New Guinea that
continues until this day. Two Fritschel brothers, who were
early professors at Wartburg, prepared hundreds of students
for pastoral service. Another pioneer, J. Michael Reu, had
wide influence both as a teacher and in his many publications
that gave substantive shape to Christian education. After
World War II, Wartburg’s president helped forge a
liaison between the Allied Military Government and the German
churches. In subsequent decades women joined the student
body and the faculty in significant numbers, and international
students came from more than a dozen countries. With today’s
many challenges, all church leaders need to recover and
reclaim their missionary identity. This requires a deep
understanding of the faith and a commitment to careful and
caring listening. Concern for the wholeness of the community,
beginning with its most vulnerable members, reflects God’s
own concern for our salvation. Every seminary graduate today
needs to be a missionary.
Christian Weber rehearses the story of
the life of Wilhelm Loehe, assessing his identity and accomplishments
in his own time (1808-1872) and laying out his significance
for the church of today and tomorrow. Loehe lived at a time
of great turmoil, due in no small part to the radical changes
brought about by the industrial revolution. His wife died
at an early age and Loehe was often on the outs with the
Lutheran Church in Germany. But he helped create a number
of social institutions and was responsible for as many as
185 pastors and other church leaders deciding to come to
work in North America. Wartburg Seminary was founded by
co-workers of Loehe in the 19th century. Loehe was alert
to the needs of his time and accepted the reality of emigration
and the challenges it posed to the church. His daily reading
of the Bible stimulated in him a vision of the ministry
of women and of the social justice dimensions of congregational
mission. Despite his own painful experience in the church,
he loved the church dearly. He affirmed that the church
must confess the faith, serve others humbly, and leave its
walls and reach out to the unchurched.
Timothy J. Wengert delves into Luther’s
understanding of the Ten Commandments in his two catechisms,
an identity-making educational experience for many of us.
Trusting God above all things is at the heart of Luther’s
understanding of the Decalogue. Luther did not think the
Third Commandment applied in a literal fashion to Christians
although he concluded that God wanted people to come together
on the Lord’s day to hear the word that frees us from
work(s). Luther often expanded the meaning of the commandments
so that the Fourth included school teachers and employers
as well as parents, and the Eighth alluded to lying and
gossip as well as to perjury. Christians were permitted
to “break” certain commandments. Hence Luther
defended his attack on the Pope against the charge that
he was breaking the Eighth Commandment. In expounding the
Sixth Commandment Luther does not provide descriptions of
activities that would violate this commandment, nor does
he mention any inequality between men and women with regard
to this commandment. We can do nothing worse than to ignore
the main function of the commandments: to put us to death
by showing our sin and driving us to the one place where
there is help: the gospel.
Jennifer Hockenbery finds a helpful word
for Good Friday in the writings of Friedrich Nietzsche,
not someone with whom we often identify. According to Nietzsche,
Jesus did not love the victim and hate the victor, but he,
as a victim, died only with love. Even those who pride themselves
on tolerance are quick to blame others or themselves, an
attitude reinforced in some of our Good Friday worship practices.
Nietzsche reminds us that when we feel guilt we blow open
the chasm that Jesus preached had been closed. Jesus suffers
with you and me rather than for you and
me. We are to love and not resent our fellow material beings;
we are to love and not resent ourselves.
Gerald H. Anderson talks about our identity
as missionaries and points to a number of important mission
themes, in a sermon preached last year at LSTC. The Great
Commission, for example, was given by an Asian (Jesus),
to Asians, in Asia. God’s redeeming activity from
the beginning sought to restore and reconcile the whole
creation. Another missionary text in Matthew (10:1) reminds
us that many have died for their testimony to the faith,
including more than 164,000 in 2002. The unity of the church
is not an end in itself, but it has a missionary purpose—so
that the world may believe. The fragmentation and disunity
of the church is a scandal that impedes the mission given
by Jesus to his followers.
We also include a sermon by Richard A. Jensen,
which he preached on the occasion of his retirement from
the Deanship of the ACTS Doctor of Ministry in Preaching
program. He used this occasion to preach on Luke, but also
to reflect on the many (positive) changes that have occurred
during his forty-three years of ministry that have shaped
his identity. How have we preachers been challenged by the
inclusion of women in ordained ministry, the new voices
of Liberation theology, and the new perspectives of our
Postmodern era? Listen to a colleague who wisely has welcomed
and embraced these changes.
Peter Klein begat Jerg begat Hans begat Johann begat Jakob
begat Johann begat Johann begat Jakob begat George begat
Ralph. That is important for me. Much more important for
me and for you is that we have all been born again to a
living hope and a lively testimony by water and Word. For
the 180th time on my watch, the serious and creative essays
in this issue are my living letter to you.
Ralph W. Klein, Editor
|